A Look at The Four Spent the Day Together by author Chris Kraus – A Cult Writer Ventures Into Fresh Territory
This latest work centers on characters chasing after fresh starts, struggling to escape drugs or toxic relationships, only to witness hope devolve into conflict. Chris Kraus frequently uses the phrase "new beginning", transforming it into deliberately jaded through its repetitions. Examples include "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They chose to begin anew" recur in the story. At the same time, Kraus herself appears to be undertaking her individual reinvention, as this presents as a novel form of writing – fact-based, authentically narrative. But then it proves to be filled with the familiar conflicts and aesthetics as past novels.
From Unplanned Author to Cult Classic
The writer started out as an artist who transitioned to writing somewhat by chance with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, which was composed of letters to an unreceptive lover, transforming confessional female writing from humiliation into rebellion. She continued writing, but the following three engaging and challenging novels did not possess the shock and immediacy that the letter form imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her role as a nonconformist creator who had become a major property owner, so there was much discussion on property transactions. It is logical that she now wants to experiment with new kinds of material, looking outwards to other people's stories, at a time when she states that contemporary political climate renders personal narrative obsolete.
Multiple Generations, Collective Unavoidable Background
The Four Spent the Day Together is organized into a trio of segments, encompassing three generations – all unable to escape their pasts. We encounter the tale of characters Emma and Jasper, based on Kraus's parents, transitioning from the New York borough to a pastoral setting. There is the narrative of the author, in the guise of a figure named Catt Greene, reckoning with the belated success of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her partner struggling with addiction her husband Paul. Finally the account of a killing of one lost young man by another in a community long abandoned by forward-thinking policies only 80 miles from Catt's cottage in the Minnesota countryside.
From my perspective as a reader attracted to refined literature of the type Kraus herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the novelistic voice of the initial segment.
As someone who reads who appreciates honed writing of the variety that Kraus herself often disregards, I was seduced by the literary tone of the initial part. It possesses a new quality of attentiveness that makes room for minutiae, like the container that the protagonist as a child dislodges from ice at the beginning of the narrative, assisted by her beloved father. "Look, an ice toy!" she declares; "a lovely toy", he responds, "the ambiguous meanings of language rolling around in their mouths like sweet treats". Kraus writes the tale of Emma with interest and closeness. "Emma experienced a dreamlike sensation – not hers, exactly."
Disappointment and Disjunction
I was fated to feel let down when I expected this fresh tone could continue through the novel. Kraus notes here that she dislikes the enjoyment readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's committed to disjunction, to the messy artistic approach she echoes from her inspiration author Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her previous novels comes back in the second segment. Catt Greene is working on refurbishing 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between the Midwest and the West Coast, unable to aid Paul control his drinking. She feels helpless as her spouse cycles through underfunded jobs as an addiction therapist in a environment propelled by the rage and anxiety that powers Trump's victory. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on a platform, her listed profession modified from "writer" to "landlord" on a reference site. Kraus still seems to be overly concerned about this. On one occasion she states that she's investigating the murder so that before leaving Minnesota, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her online critics would fail to comprehend, would not even perceive".
The Homicide Account
Thus we arrive to the actual killing – and the referenced day spent by the murdered individual with the perpetrator and his associates. The author possesses compelling foundational content, and knows hour by hour what transpired when Brandon came to visit Brittney after connecting via an application where she offered adult photos. He was hoping for sex but seems amiably to have occupied the day in the company of her associates, wandering about getting his car mended and covering the cost of food and substances, before being shot by Brittney's boyfriend a man named Micah – a young, mentally ill man who has often been institutionalized for fits of anger.
Preoccupation and Open Ends
Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I was intrigued by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards ethical reporting and audacious rule-breaking clash in this segment. Yet I wished her to delve deeper into her individual preoccupations here. The standout figure is the character Brittney, who gains dimension partly through Catt seeing herself in her – another bright, bullied girl going off the rails in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the extent that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par