🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.